Home » 2012 » March

Photographer looks to share, maintain his investment

Photography Rights Protections.001

Photographers and videographers need to maintain their rights to their work and protect it against unfair use through some form of copyright. Their images are their livelihoods and a part of their toolbox as much as their equipment. (Gregory Rowe/Fast Draw Media)

Looking at his images, one can see a high level of dedication to the art and craft of photography. Often presented in a subdued manner, the people and events in his photographs don’t seem like flat still images, but rather moments of emotion and movement frozen for all time.

David Cheney, who owns a photography business bearing his name in Greenville, Texas, has been in the business for four years and wants to protect the images he works so hard to produce.

In talking to his legal representation, Cheney understands the photographer maintains rights to his images both in a digital format and for printing purposes from the time the image is created. He uses a copyright notice on his website, but he said he has not registered his site with the U.S. Copyright Office, nor registered any individual images up to this point.

In showing his work to potential clients on his website, Cheney said he uses “a Flash website to help control random downloads” while maintaining the quality of his work for people to see. He said he also uses metadata tags in his images that help him control how photos are downloaded off the site.

“I also have a password-protected proofing area on my website for clients to look at to keep the access limited,” he said.

“I have been surprised at how well professional photo printers, even Wal-Mart, helps photographers protect their work,” he said.

Cheney said he had one client, in the early days of his business when he basically turned all of the images over to the client for a set fee, which attempted to make prints at Wal-Mart.

“They called me and wanted my verbal permission before they would make the prints,” he said.

For this reason, Cheney said he began releasing certain specified rights to photos he takes. He said he includes the printing and use rights for up to 15 images he takes in the photo and portrait packages he offers clients, but retains the right to use the photos for marketing and display purposes. The release form he uses includes both an agreement for the client’s use of the 15 images, as well as a release clause for his future use of the images.

Cheney said he does want to protect his work, but also sees a need to balance client goodwill and marketing of his product with the need to copyright his work.

“Most of what I do with portraits and weddings is pretty personal,” he said. “In four years, I haven’t had any trouble with people downloading and using random images off my site.”

He did say he began offering a print package of the released images for clients to maintain quality control over his work after he noticed an early client print photos on standard copy paper with a bad color ink cartridge. He said he didn’t want to have is name associated with poor quality printing, which he sees as being as big a deal as protecting his investment in his work through copyright and fair use agreements.

Cheney admits that as his business grows, he will need to seek the advice of a legal professional in maintaining control over the distribution and use of his work.

And, judging from the images on his site, he may need to do that sooner than later.

Share

Schools work to keep student information private

Week 1 - LAJ - Composite Image.001When it comes to reporting education news, student privacy concerns should remain upmost in the reporter’s mind. In most states, as well as at the federal level, laws are in place to protect the privacy of student information, both about their educational needs and also regarding their discipline.

The major federal law regarding the privacy of student information is the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). This law limits access to a student’s information to school officials for school related purposes, to the student’s parents or legal guardians until the student turns 18 and to the student individually after age 18. According to information found on the U.S. Department of Education website, “Parents and students put their trust in the stewards of education data to ensure students’ personal information is properly safeguarded and is used only for legitimate purposes and only when absolutely necessary. The Department deeply values this trust and strives to ensure it is doing all it can do to protect the privacy of our students as the uses of their data to improve education increase.” The law seeks to provide these protections to American students and their families and applies to all areas of education: public or private; primary, secondary and post-secondary (colleges and universities).

In Texas, Government Code § 552.114 governs the privacy of student records. Chapter 552 of the Government Code is actually related to open records in the state, but student educational records are one exception to the open record requirements, basically eliminating the possibility of a reporter making a request under the Texas Open Records Act or the Freedom of Information Act.

“The reason for these privacy issues is we don’t want to give out any information of an address where someone may live,” said Juan Solis, PRIDE Academy Principal and Bullying and Peer Mediation Coordinator at Quinlan ISD and an education doctoral student. “We don’t know what other people’s ideas may be, what their thought process is or what may lead to a very, very traumatic incident. We don’t want to be responsible because we were the ones that gave out an address where an angry parent went to confront someone and something bad ended up happening.”

Solis said this is the reason Quinlan ISD policy is that information about a student is not given to anyone not on the student’s contact list, unless it has been requested by a law enforcement or child protective agency.

He also stated that most districts have policies in place that allow parents and guardians to opt-out of having student information, like honors and awards, and images submitted to the media, even to have those images and information barred from the district’s own website.

Solis said the severity of consequences for educators who violate student privacy protections is largely based on the nature of the breach and how severe an action parents take. He said they could range from a simple reprimand up to an educator having a teaching license revoked.

The basic thing, Solis said, is for educators at all levels, to remain professional in the interactions with students and parents and in the handling of student information.

“The advice that has been given to us by our professors and other professionals is, ‘If you think it could make headline news, you probably don’t need to do it.’”

Share